Skip to main content

I wonder whether these cars are all kit cars regardless of the company who actually built them? There is so much knowledge about how to fix the problems I've been experiencing on this list. Do all of you have to rebuild the cars in order to make them usable? When I buy a refrigerator I expect the ice maker to work.

Since buying my Speedster in July I've:

  • turned the carburetors around so that the adjustment screws could be accessed
  • rebuilt the carburetor linkage
  • installed new shocks (the ones on the car were worn out at 11k miles)
  • disassembled rear torsion bar and plates to insure they were set to specification)
  • added caster shims to the front end
  • and yesterday installed the camber compensator.

My car had an anti-sway bar installed; that was not an issue.  Everything I have done, with the guidance of folks on the list, has made a marked improvement to the handling or ease of service.

Why has all this been necessary? Why did the builder not do these things before my car left his "factory"? The handling problems are safety issues. You could be killed going home.

Are there some builders that include who include these modifications in their base cars?

Some of you have had your cars many years and have gone through this process. Some have had several cars and some built kits. I suspect most of us came to the Speedster because of the looks and not having $300,000 for an original and are blindsided by the faults in the cars.

At issue is not the cost of the upgrades, but the fact that they should not have to be done at all. The ice maker ought to work! You can argue that the changes to the carburetors did not have to be done, but everything that has to do with handling should have been installed at the "factory".

I've owned Porsche's and kit cars. When building my own kit (35 years ago) I had to take care of these things during the build. A knowledgeable prospective owner (I was not) will asked the questions and have the handling problems addressed before taking delivery.

Caveat emptor!

After all of that, I'm edging up on proper handling. Stan suggested that I need about 40lbs added to the front. The lack of a spare, jack and tools would be about that. I really don't think that I have enough room up front for even a small emergency spare and any luggage. Guess I'll be adding lead.

I'll keep you posted.

 

 

 

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Try to modify that ice maker for the upcoming wild party and you're out of luck though.

If you go in looking for lowest cost Speedster - those options and attention to detail will be bypassed for sure. 

I'd avoid the lead - you want to reduce weight for performance not add dead weight.  A larger gas tank maybe - gas is about 8#/gallon.  A small jack, can of tire Slime and tools will complete the weight needed.

Last edited by WOLFGANG
Jim Gilbert - Madison, Mississippi posted:

I wonder whether these cars are all kit cars regardless of the company who actually built them? There is so much knowledge about how to fix the problems I've been experiencing on this list. Do all of you have to rebuild the cars in order to make them usable? When I buy a refrigerator I expect the ice maker to work.

Since buying my Speedster in July I've:

  • turned the carburetors around so that the adjustment screws could be accessed
  • rebuilt the carburetor linkage
  • installed new shocks (the ones on the car were worn out at 11k miles)
  • disassembled rear torsion bar and plates to insure they were set to specification)
  • added caster shims to the front end
  • and yesterday installed the camber compensator.

My car had an anti-sway bar installed; that was not an issue.  Everything I have done, with the guidance of folks on the list, has made a marked improvement to the handling or ease of service.

Why has all this been necessary? Why did the builder not do these things before my car left his "factory"? The handling problems are safety issues. You could be killed going home.

Are there some builders that include who include these modifications in their base cars?

Some of you have had your cars many years and have gone through this process. Some have had several cars and some built kits. I suspect most of us came to the Speedster because of the looks and not having $300,000 for an original and are blindsided by the faults in the cars.

At issue is not the cost of the upgrades, but the fact that they should not have to be done at all. The ice maker ought to work! You can argue that the changes to the carburetors did not have to be done, but everything that has to do with handling should have been installed at the "factory".

I've owned Porsche's and kit cars. When building my own kit (35 years ago) I had to take care of these things during the build. A knowledgeable prospective owner (I was not) will asked the questions and have the handling problems addressed before taking delivery.

Caveat emptor!

After all of that, I'm edging up on proper handling. Stan suggested that I need about 40lbs added to the front. The lack of a spare, jack and tools would be about that. I really don't think that I have enough room up front for even a small emergency spare and any luggage. Guess I'll be adding lead.

I'll keep you posted.

 

 

 

 

I’ll ask the obvious question- who built your car? 

Jim---if that's your Speedster---the blue one-- I have to say it is gorgeous.  Too bad these cars are so beautiful otherwise we wouldn't take the time and trouble to sort and upgrade them.  I'm interested to see that answer to Blake's question.  I know that the IMs come pre sorted---same as the ones Alan and Troy sell  but the two or three "value" brands most often did not---although I read about improvements being made in construction and features.  In line with your list of upgrades I'll list mine and I won't say "so far" because It's perfect for my needs now. It would have been nice to pay the $25k or so that my Speedster cost me and for that end up with Marty's car but it doesn't work that way as we all know.  To get my Vintage Speedster  where it is today it has taken a lot of time and more money than I'd admit to make these improvements;

1.  New Type IV engine to replace the 1915                                                                               

2. Camber compensator

3. Anti sway bar

4.  Beam braces

5. Paint floor with truck bed liner

6. Dynomat everywhere incl. doors

7. New interior

8. Window leak fix

9. Floor leak fix (Hopefully!)

10. Add spare tire (Donut)

11. New emerg. brake cover (no holes like a Bug)

12. Wolo loud air horn

13. Espar heater

14 replace EMPI carbs  with Dellortos.

15. Color sanded paint

I'm finished with this project now and just drive it.  Lots.   It and so many Speedster friends have  added so much to my life these past 13 years it's owned me!  Calling this adventure "The Madness" is a perfect description.  

 

 

 

Last edited by Jack Crosby

Jack, most of what you have done has been done. I don't have the beam braces. Dynamat everywhere. My car has a  FOCAL stereo with a base reflex box where the rear seat should be. It was there when I bought it and takes up most of the usable storage behind the seats. Something I ddin't need.

How does it handle?

I love a project, but don't want it to go on indefinitely and I am not as unhappy with the car as my post might sound. It probably gets more attention than I'd really like. I do want it to be safe. I want it to handle like a 356 and there is no reason that it should not. The platforms are so similar.

The curb weight of a VW Beetle convertible was 1808lbs. The curb weight of a REAL Porsche Speedster was 1676lbs. I haven't weighted my car but I would expect we're pretty close.

Has anyone weighted their car?

 

 

@DannyP has a set of scales. He’d be the guy to ask about the average speedster’s corner and total weight.

Just a minor point of clarification— I may have advocated putting more weight in the front at some point in the past, but for the last few years that would not be my recommendation. Adding weight to a car is not the way to make it handle better. You’re going to need to soften up the front, which means pulling leaves out unless you can do it with the Avis adjusters.

If you want your speedster to handle like a sports car, you’re going to find yourself limited by the swing axle. If you just want to cruise around, you’ll probably never noticed the difference. 

From a 2016 post:

A bunch of us weighed our cars at Carlisle one year.  If you search on carlisle car weights or corner weights you'll get some hits to follow.

My CMC was heavier than most at almost 2,000 pounds, full tank, "Space-saver" spare tire, bunch of spare parts and tools, no driver, full tank, beer cooler on the back seat  and maybe 20 pounds of soundproofing all over the place.  I believe that CMCs are heavier, in general, because los Amigos who manned the chopper gun at CMC when the bodies were being made worked slowly, making the fiberglass thicker than other cars.  For example, the glass above the dash where the center windshield strut goes through is over 3/8" thick on my car and the tops of the front fenders where the mirrors mount are 3/8" (left) and 7/16" (right).  That's thick!

IIRC, the CMC's tended to be heavier than VS and Beck by 40-50 pounds and most of the CMCs were around 1,850 or so and up, so I guess you're in the ballpark.

So now about your questions:

A "Beam Brace" is a piece of pipe with one ended bolted to the front beam and the other end bolted to the forward corners of the pan where cockpit ends (just before your feet).  It is intended to impede any lateral movement of the beam during very hard cornering and/or bump negotiation.  If you have a pan made after 1965 or so the need decreases because VW changed the beam head mount then to make it stiffer.  If you are considering racing your car on the track, I might recommend a pair of beam braces, otherwise you might not ever notice a need for them.  John Steele recommended them heavily right after we all had a discussion about them on here so that's why some of his car builds had them  - the customers requested them after they saw them on here.  Here's one I like because it can be duplicated by a competent shop for about $50 per side, welding and shaping included - Please note that CSP shows them "out of stock" but, again, they're easy to make.

http://www2.cip1.com/ProductDe...1%2D498%2D001%2D111A

There are others, just google "VW Beam Brace" for hits.  Do many of us have them?  I dunno - I think there is a handful of cars on here with them - that's about it.

I probably should note that Porsche did not install Camber Compensators (or Beam Braces) at the factory.  The factory did not feel them necessary for road cars - they were all installed by customers or their dealerships, just like outside mirrors.  IIRC, the designer of the most successful camber compensator was a guy on the West Coast who was an avid racer, figured out what was happening back there and found a cheap way to overcome the weakness.  Most people buying original 356's did not then, nor have they now installed camber compensators, simply because they were "gentlemen racers", meaning that they drove their 356 to the track to watch other people race other cars on the track.  Besides, the original cars had 1/2 the horsepower of our cars or less, no disk brakes until 1960 and they couldn't be driven as hard.  The way most of us drive on here, anyone with a swing-arm suspension needs a camber compensator to avoid wheel tuck-under and a potential roll-over on extreme hard cornering.

So apart from the camber compensator, the only thing you really needed to do was get a good alignment and add caster shims - something that all of us have done.  The rest of the stuff, like front anti-sway bars, shocks, re-setting ride height, etc., a lot of us have done (myself included) either because we felt a need (like you did) or we read about something on here and thought "Hey!  I need to do that, too!"

So, along with Jack, I have front and rear anti-sway bars (my car is an IRS), a Kafer Brace, front disks, Koni shocks (a mixed blessing - nice handling but harsher ride), wider wheels/bigger tires, MUCH better seats and an Eberspaecher gas heater (since with my 2,110 I have no heater boxes).  The interior now looks more like a Cabriolet than a Speedster but it feels good.  Meh...

Lastly, many of us have bemoaned the poor quality coming out of some of the "Kit Car Shops" over the years so I won't go there.  Yes, it would be relatively easy for them to complete and bug-proof the cars leaving their shops for a few bucks more, but they simply do not do so.  They have a waiting list of customers for their cars so why would they?  If you read about them on here and think, "That was then but this is now and I'm sure they've gotten better", well, some have, some haven't, but continued research on here should point that out.  It should also point out who the good builders are so maybe you could direct your spare cash to them, instead?

Anyway, sorry for the long post, but you were looking for answers........

Post Script:  Stan wrote: "If you want your speedster to handle like a sports car, you’re going to find yourself limited by the swing axle. If you just want to cruise around, you’ll probably never noticed the difference. "

That's the absolute truth.  I drove a local VS this past summer, in a hilly part of the state with delightful back roads.  I quickly became a sedate "cruiser" compared to how I drove my IRS car, simply because the body lean and squirriliness of the rear end on even moderately hard cornering didn't feel safe to me.  Remember, this was not my car so I wasn't about to push it, but compared to my car the handling was night and day different.

Last edited by Gordon Nichols

Couple of things...

I owned a 356SC in about 1980. Curb weight for the coupe or convertible was 2061lbs, handled like a sports car and had swing axles.

The numbers I quoted are taken from "Porsche Technical Manual" by Henry Elfrink. I have no data on the 4 cam cars.

My car is based on a 1964 VW convertible  floor pan and has the factory modification to the front pan negating straighteners. Convertibles may have been different from sedans. They weigh more for a reason. The sedan weighted 1720lbs.

The quote about adding 40lbs to the front was incorrectly attributed to Stan, It was from ALB and sounds reasonable since I have no spare, jack and tools.

"The quote about adding 40lbs to the front was incorrectly attributed to Stan, It was from ALB and sounds reasonable since I have no spare, jack and tools."

That, in itself, is remarkable since Al seems to want to drill holes in just about everything to reduce weight in the car.  

I had to delete the spare in my CMC when I added the gas heater in the nose of the car.  In doing so I feel that I've lost about 15 pounds out there but haven't noticed any difference in handling on the road.  I haven't been on the track since the heater install so no data points there (yet!)

I did go with the CSP beam braces. Wolfgang is right about blocking the beam lube nipples.  On my car, only one nipple on the left side is blocked and loosening a couple of bolts to move the beam brace a little to get the grease gun onto the nipple  adds just a few minutes to lubing the beam.  My car always rode like a dream before the braces were added but  I definitely have a more solid feeling after installing them.  Especially going over bumps or RR tracks.  

The CSP braces were higher priced but seemed a lot more solid than the EMPI ones.  I don't skimp at all on the Speedster---part of the madness, I know.  

When Jake installed the Type IV he did add a Kafer brace that is welded in to prevent engine twist on hard acceleration. ---It's a big triangle, I think of stainless steel.  Another reason was that the  engine  is 35-40 pounds heavier than the Type I was.  But for 35-40 pounds of weight I got as much power as the Porsche 4 cam racing engine produces.

Jim, Danny P. Weighed my car at 1,763 pounds with the front being 46% and the rear, 54%.

 

 

Gordon Nichols posted:

"The quote about adding 40lbs to the front was incorrectly attributed to Stan, It was from ALB and sounds reasonable since I have no spare, jack and tools."

That, in itself, is remarkable since Al seems to want to drill holes in just about everything to reduce weight in the car.  

I had to delete the spare in my CMC when I added the gas heater in the nose of the car.  In doing so I feel that I've lost about 15 pounds out there but haven't noticed any difference in handling on the road.  I haven't been on the track since the heater install so no data points there (yet!)

In the front, Gordon, there's no reason to reduce sprung weight (the car) as it's more than light enough already with the front/rear weight bias as it is with a typical Speedster. If you can pare down unsprung weight (wheels, tires, suspension, brakes) that's always going to benefit. 

BTW- I've finished drilling my type 3 rear brake backing plates- pics to come later...

1. (rare) correction to Stan: You can't "soften" front suspension with the adjusters. They raise and lower it only. To soften--decrease--the spring rate, remove some of the small leaves. It's a greasy job but not very difficult. 

2. re Jack's statement "But for 35-40 pounds of weight I got as much power as the Porsche 4 cam racing engine produces."  I believe you got WAY MORE POWER than the legendary 4-cam, which started at 110 hp (and a whopping 90 ft-lbs of torque at about 5000 rpm) and ended up in the (help me out guys?) 160 hp range?

I think the Raby Type 4 engines have at minimum more horses than the best-tuned Type 547 engines. And my standard-heat Raby Type 1 1914 has about 35 percent more torque than the 547/1. 

Any hand built car needs sorting and the higher end builders try to add 200 miles on the car to sort it out.  I still recommend a week visit at the initial car pickup so that you make fina adjustments and further testing. 

You never know what you’ll find and the builder is close at that moment.

support from far away is hard no matter who the higher end builder is if you have an issue.

Hey even VW in 2012 forgot the whole back seat ducts for heating on the right side of our car... go figure

 

Jim:  

Back a few years, three people on here bought new Speedsters from one of the known, 3-letter builders on the west coast and another place that is (thankfully) no longer building cars (that I know of).  When they were delivered to the East Coast, one of them had a loose steering coupler, another had some other suspension issues and the other one had some other safety issue that I can't remember (but all of this stuff was documented on here).  All of them needed a good 4-wheel alignment - they weren't even in the ballpark, IIRC, but they all looked great, even if they weren't safe.

Much typing and gum-gnashing ensued and while the builders (often, but not always) attempted to rectify things, they were 3,000 miles away and sending the car back (buyer paying the freight at least one-way) was cost-prohibitive so the buyers got things fixed where they were and sometimes the builder paid for the fixes.  Not a great solution, but a solution nonetheless.

About that time, I wrote an article that is up in the Resource/knowledge section on here, that was my pass at a checklist for all new owners (whether they bought their car from a builder or private party) just to make sure everything was checked and found to be OK from a safety aspect.  I see that you are not a supporting member so you may not be able to see it here:

https://www.speedsterowners.co...acceptance-checklist

So, since I wrote it, here it is to give you a few more things to check out that you might not have thought of:

Acceptance checklist for a new Speedster/Spyder (any builder)

Note:  This list is just a beginning and doesn’t cover every optional item or accessory available from the builders.   This is only meant to get you to a safe and acceptable car before and upon delivery.

Safety Inspection:

Suspension

  1. Check all tie rod ends for tightness. (22 ft. lbs.)
  2. Check tie rod locking clamps for tightness. (22 ft. lbs. for clamps, 29 ft. lbs. for locknuts)
  3. Check ball joints/front hubs for no-play tightness (jack up front, bar under tire and jiggle)  Ball joint nuts should be 36 ft. lbs (10mm nuts ) or 51 ft. lbs. (12 mm nuts)
  4. Check the front wheel bearings for (a.) adequate lubricating grease and (b.) proper bearing pre-load (.001”-.003” acceptable end play).
  5. Check front axle beam mounting bolts for tightness (36 ft. lbs.)
  6. Check pitman arm nut for tightness (72 ft. lbs.)
  7. Check for max +- 1” play or less at top of steering wheel, front wheels centered.
  8. Check steering wheel hub nut and wheel adapter attach bolts/screws for tightness.
  9. Check steering column coupler and steering box mounts for tightness. (18 ft. lbs.)

10. Check ALL wheel lug nuts for proper torque (5-lug= 72 ft. lbs., 4-lug = 90 ft. lbs.) NOTE:  alloy wheels may require different torques.  Check with your builder for proper wheel lug torque settings.

 

11. Check spring plate bolts for tightness on rear suspension (87 ft. lbs.)

 

12. Check diagonal arm bolts for tightness (87 ft. lbs.)

 

13. Inspect rear torsion bar cover plate for tightness

 

14. Insure that all corners of the car sit equally

 

15.  No “creaking” or squeaks or clunking when fender corners are bounced – all shock absorbers should be tight.

 

16. Check rear wheel hub castellated nuts – torque to 260 – 275 ft. lbs.

 

17. Check the mount points on any anti-sway bars (if equipped) for proper tightness.

 

Brakes

  1. Inspect all wheel brake cylinders, flexible hoses and fittings for any leakage.
  2. Check the master cylinder (pull left front wheel for easy access) for any leaks at the fittings, and/or any leaks at the push rod behind the brake pedal in the cockpit (look under the carpet for wetness).  The brake fluid reservoir should have fluid to the “Full” mark in both halves of the container.
  3. Check that the brake pedal push rod keeper is in place on the brake pedal.
  4. Make sure BOTH foot pedals are lined up equal when at rest.  (the adjustment is on the floor below the pedals)
  5. Check Brake pedal free-play – should be ½”-¾” Max travel at top of pedal.
  6. Firmly depress the brake pedal.  It should feel quite firm.

Brake Road test: 

  1. Check for good stopping power – There should be no side pulling when applying brakes, but remember that these are NOT “Power assist” brakes and a bit more foot power may be required to stop.
  2. Test emergency brake when underway – there should be no side pulling when e-brake is applied. If there is, then the ebrake should be adjusted on both rear wheels.

 

Lights/horn

  1. Check Horn
  2. Check all lights including brake lights
  3. Check for proper operation of directional lights and emergency flashers
  4. Check inside courtesy lights for operation

Gauges

  1.  Check gauge lights for proper operation (yes, some backlit gauges tend to be dim)
  2.  Check all gauges for proper operation – Fuel, Temp, Pressure (if equipped) Tachometer should be smooth (these tend to fail a lot) and Speedo should be smooth, quiet and not jumpy when under way.
  3. Check fuel gauge – NOTE!  Some fuel gauges have more needle “swing” when the car is in motion than others.  Needle swing of up to ½ tank is considered “normal”.

Cockpit Functions

  1. Check windshield wipers
  2. Check the operation of all Dashboard switches.
  3. Check Emergency Brake operation – engage brake and release clutch in 1’st gear.  Engine should immediately stall.
  4. Check clutch pedal free play – should be 3/8” at top of pedal, adjustable at the throw-out arm on top/side of the transmission (Big Wing Nut).
  5. Gear Selection – should be able to easily engage all forward and reverse gears without “searching”
  6. Check operation of the heater/defroster controls
  7. Check operation of the A/C controls and cold output – output from the cold registers should be about 40 degrees

 Engine

  1. Check fan belt free-play – push against the belt half way between pulleys – belt should deflect about ¾” and not “squeal” when engine is rev’d.  Tension is adjusted by adding/removing shims between the upper pulley halves.  Extra shims should be between the upper pulley nut and the outer pulley half.
  2. Check all fuel line connections for tightness and no leaking
  3. Check timing:  6 degrees BTDC at idle for vacuum advance distributors, 30 degrees BTDC at 3000 rpm for centrifugal advance distributors
  4. Check oil level with engine off.  Dip Stick is just to the right of the lower fan belt pulley and has lower (fill) and upper (full) embossed marks on the stick.
  5. Remove air cleaners and check carburetor top screws for tightness – replace air cleaners
  6. Check idle speed – Should be around 800 RPM and smooth after warm-up.
  7. If you have access to an air flow meter, synchronize all four carburetor throats.
  8. Inspect engine for any oil leaks, especially at pushrod tubes (either end), sump plate, base of cylinder barrels at the case, oil pump (behind lower fan belt pulley) and at bottom of the bell housing.  A little oil wetness from behind the lower (crankshaft) pulley is considered normal.
  9. Check for oil leaks at any fittings used for an external oil filter and/or external oil cooler.  These items may be mounted almost anywhere on the car, so you’ll have to trace the hoses and see if all fittings are dry.

10. Check operation of the engine breather system if so equipped.  Breather is a box mounted to the firewall with hoses running to the valve covers, or a box mounted to the top of the oil filer, or a can mounted to the top of the oil filler.  There should also be a hose running either down past the oil dipstick to vent below the engine, or, rather, a hose venting into the air cleaner of one or both carburetors.  There should be no leaks from this system except for the hose vented to below the engine.

 

11. Check for proper heater operation (if equipped).  There are several different versions of heat.  Ask the builder or previous owner how it works and make sure it is producing heat.  These cars are notorious for only producing minimal heat so don’t expect too much.

 

12. When idling, it is considered “normal” for there to be a small amount of valve noise (gentle clicking).  Hard knocks, raps grinding or hammer-noises is not considered “normal”.

 

13. Check Valve Clearance:  Steel Push rods are set to 0.000 - .002” Intake and Exhaust.  All other engines with aluminum push rods are set to .006” for BOTH intake and exhaust until you find out from your engine builder the correct spec for your engine (there are many variations on this – it’s best to talk with your builder).

 

 

Transmission

  1.  Inspect transmission for leaks at all seams, at side plates, at filler (side) and drain (bottom) plugs, and at wheel back plates (for axle seal leak).
  2. Inspect bottom of bell housing for oil leak – this could be caused by either a transmission input shaft seal leak or an engine flywheel end seal leak.
  3. When underway, the transmission should shift smoothly and easily into all gears with no whining or grinding.
  4. NOTE!  Reverse is often found by pushing down on the gear shift lever, moving left as far as possible and then pulling back (with the clutch depressed).  On some cars there my be a reverse lockout button on the side of the shift handle that must be pushed in, or a reverse lockout ring on the front of the gearshift lever that must be pulled up before moving the lever to “reverse”.

 

Cosmetic Items

Exterior

  1. Check door hinge bolts for tightness
  2. Check for paint overspray on all surfaces
  3.  Site along outside doors for surface waviness – they should be straight
  4. Site along body contour between engine cover and rear seat – it should not be wavy or bulbous (indicates a bubble in the fiberglass)
  5. Entire car should be free of paint cutting/polishing compound – this stuff looks like flat colored paint or off-color dull paint (or no paint) and you should be able to scrape it off with your fingernail.  It should not be left on there and should be removed by a professional paint/autobody company.
  6. Check for excessive “orange Peel” in the paint – this can be removed by color-sanding the paint, but requires a professional paint/body shop to do it.
  7. Check for “runs” in the paint – these, too, can be color-sanded out by a professional shop.
  8. Check for blemishes in the chrome everywhere.
     

Interior

  1. Check for professional seams in the carpets, door panels and seats
  2. Check for proper installation of carpeting and vinyl panels – most of these are glued on and sometimes let go.
  3. Check for tightness of any interior accessory – door and window handles, dash grab handle, rear view mirror(s), dash knobs, convertible top latches
  4. Check the radio (if equipped) for proper operation in all modes (bring along your iPod for an MP3 driver)
  5. Check power windows (if equipped) for proper and smooth operation.
  6. Check for smooth operation of the seats fore and aft – check operation of the recliners if so equipped.
  7. Check operation of the cup holders if so equipped.
  8. Check operation of any auxiliary power points if so equipped.
  9. Check for smooth operation of the convertible top and proper latching of the top to the windshield header – the latches should pull the top in about ¼”-3/8” only.  All snaps along the rear bulkhead (behind the rear seat) should line up with their respective snaps on top without excessive pulling/alignment.

10. Check the installation if the side windows to make sure they fit properly with no serious gaps.

 

Typical DMV Inspection Items

  1. Ball Joints – free play
  2. Wheel hub play – should be zero hub play on all four wheels
  3. Steering play - +- 1” left/right play at top of steering wheel
  4. All lights should be operational – including parking lights
  5. Directional Lights, brake lights, emergency flashers should work
  6. Engage emergency brake, start engine and allow to idle, engage first gear, bring engine rpms up to 2,000 and release clutch – engine should immediately stall.
  7. Wipers should work (only one speed is necessary – two speeds is a bonus)
  8. You should know where your Vehicle Inspection Number (VIN) is located:  Pan based cars have the VIN stamped into the top of the central tunnel behind the seats.  IM VIN Location:       Beck/Special Edition VIN Location:  SAS Vin Location:   VS/CMC/JPS VIN Location:  Thunder Ranch VIN location:
  9. VW-Pan-Based cars should not be subject to current emissions testing as they are usually registered as the VW VIN number which suggests that they are early VW beetles and smog test exempt.  IM and Beck cars must be registered as “replicas” to be smog exempt, while SAS cars usually are registered as year-of-manufacture and pass smog tests for that year as a Subaru.

 

Shipping Notes

 

  1. If possible and within your budget, ALWAYS SHIP IN A CLOSED CARRIER AND STIPULATE THAT YOU’LL BE ABOVE OTHER CARS.  If not, you may end up on the bottom of a 2-level truck and have brake fluid or oil drip onto your car, or have road debris, thrown from another vehicle, hit your car.  Not good.
  2. Past experience has shown that “winched on” is better than “drive on”.  Too many times we’ve seen damage caused by a driver who simply did not know the car and screwed something up or broke something.
  3. Always ask on the SOC for a list of recommended transport companies and use the ones recommended.  To not do so is at your own (and your car’s) peril.

The Speedstah Guy from Grafton

Gordon,

An excellent list. All should be done. I'm afraid that those of us that are a continent away won't usually be able to avail ourselves to the builder. This is where a reputation for quality is most needed.

I'm already done but it would be great if some of you California and Arizona folks would offer a pre-shipping inspection service for a fee. Posted prominently here would be a big help to outher buyers.

Gordon's checklist is amazing and if builders used such a list to check their finished cars there would be a lot of time and money saved for both buyer and seller.  I have used Gordon's list to go over my own car before a big trip and always find something that could stand some attention attention.   Thanks to Gordon for such a valuable addition to the knowledge base.  I love Jim's suggestion that someone should offer a pre delivery  service using this check list --I see great value for the buyer and a few hundred quid for an inspector.  I'd gladly spend something like $300 for such a service.  Sort of like a home inspector.  Who buys a house without having an inspection done?  Same thing for a car we almost can guarantee several issues will be present.  What if Tom DeWalt had this service available for the green disaster back in the day?   

Last edited by Jack Crosby
Gordon Nichols posted:

"The quote about adding 40lbs to the front was incorrectly attributed to Stan, It was from ALB and sounds reasonable since I have no spare, jack and tools."

That, in itself, is remarkable since Al seems to want to drill holes in just about everything to reduce weight in the car.  

I had to delete the spare in my CMC when I added the gas heater in the nose of the car.  In doing so I feel that I've lost about 15 pounds out there but haven't noticed any difference in handling on the road.  I haven't been on the track since the heater install so no data points there (yet!)

(Just a little thread drift) Gordon-

Yes, I've been drilling holes in lots of stuff! Although my car is irs I went to the shorter swingaxle torsion bars and (originally) Sway-a-Way adjustable spring plates (which bridged the gap between the swing torsion bars and irs trailing arms). 3 issues with the aftermarket spring plates- they're HEAVY! (2550 grams- that's over 5 1/2 lbs each! and they're sprung weight), the adjuster block takes up room that could be used for wider tires and (when I really thought of it) once I set the rear ride height I will probably never change it, so keeping them really didn't make much sense. At the urging of my friend Bruce I took some swingaxle spring plates, shortened and narrowed them, cut the slots for the bolts, drilled a few holes and voila!- 

lightened spring plate- cut down for irs

here we are- irs spring plates for the shorter torsion bars. This example weighs 997 grams (a 1553 g or 3 lb, 6 3/4 oz reduction! per side!! and I haven't figured out the weight savings with the shorter torsion bars yet!!!), and when I weigh stock single and double irs spring plates I'll let you all know what I find...

With a pair of my late 6" Fuchs worked into 7" 911R configuration (widened 1" to the inside) it looks like the wheels with 205's (on the type 1 drums) clear the inner stuff by about 1/8" or so (the top snubber stop thingy still has to be trimmed a little more as well) and even clears the fender (on the right side- I haven't assembled the left yet- this week). I'd probably see about using a 1/8" spacer on each drum (for a little more spring plate clearance) if this was my end goal, but since I plan on running type 3 rear brakes (which will add 5/8" track to each side) the trailing arms will need to be narrowed a little anyway, so I can build in the spacing then.

 The trailing arms haven't been done yet, but I have been modifying the type 3 backing plates a little and drilled a few holes

lightened type 3 rear backing plate

(about 360) in each backing plate. And yes, it took one heck of a long time (I was at it off and on for 4 months). The backing plates originally weighed 1284 and 1285 grams and when I first started I was hoping to remove 100 grams on each. I thought I was doing really well when I had them down to 1070 g. and felt like I was pretty much finished (you have no idea how many hours are into these things!) when after showing the latest result of my work to Bruce one evening and he casually said (while we were partaking of a beverage in his garage), "I wonder what a type 1 backing plate weighs?". Oh boy... Well, we dug 1 up, stripped it, cleaned it a up (a little), put it on the scale and it weighed in at 1020 g. Bruce looks at me and says "yours isn't even as light as the type 1- there's lots of weight you can still take off! Are you really going to put it on the car like that?". And back to the drill press I went (this was all done at home on a small bench sized drill press or in a bench vice, btw). Each of the backing plates now weighs 852 grams- that's over 430 grams (15oz) lighter for each backing plate! This is the set up for drilling the holes on the outside edge- 

drilling holes in the edge

 

I know, a little crude, but it actually worked quite well! You just couldn't push on the plywood very hard. I really would love to own a rotary table. And the sad part is- every time I look at these things I see more places to remove weight...

One last pic- the flywheel started out lightened from GBE at 5241 grams (11 1/2 lbs), and after 6 or 7 hours at a friend's shop (this couldn't have been done without the accuracy of the milling and rotary tables), it

Al's lightened flywheel 

weighed in afterward at 4370 g. I removed 870 grams (1lb, 14.6 oz) so the flywheel now weighs just over 9 1/2 lbs. As a machinist I'm not very fast, but I did it all myself... Al

Attachments

Images (4)
  • lightened spring plate- cut down for irs
  • lightened type 3 rear backing plate
  • drilling holes in the edge
  • Al's lightened flywheel
Last edited by ALB
ALB posted:
Gordon Nichols posted:

"The quote about adding 40lbs to the front was incorrectly attributed to Stan, It was from ALB and sounds reasonable since I have no spare, jack and tools."

That, in itself, is remarkable since Al seems to want to drill holes in just about everything to reduce weight in the car.  

I had to delete the spare in my CMC when I added the gas heater in the nose of the car.  In doing so I feel that I've lost about 15 pounds out there but haven't noticed any difference in handling on the road.  I haven't been on the track since the heater install so no data points there (yet!)

(Just a little thread drift) Gordon-

Yes, I've been drilling holes in lots of stuff! Although my car is irs I went to the shorter swingaxle torsion bars and (originally) Sway-a-Way adjustable spring plates (which bridged the gap between the swing torsion bars and irs trailing arms). 3 issues with the aftermarket spring plates- they're HEAVY! (2550 grams- that's over 5 1/2 lbs each! and they're sprung weight), the adjuster block takes up room that could be used for wider tires and (when I really thought of it) once I set the rear ride height I will probably never change it, so keeping them really didn't make much sense. At the urging of my friend Bruce I took some swingaxle spring plates, shortened and narrowed them, cut the slots for the bolts, drilled a few holes and voila!- 

lightened spring plate- cut down for irs

here we are- irs spring plates for the shorter torsion bars. This example weighs 997 grams (a 1553 g or 3 lb, 6 3/4 oz reduction! per side!! and I haven't figured out the weight savings with the shorter torsion bars yet!!!), and when I weigh stock single and double irs spring plates I'll let you all know what I find...

With a pair of my late 6" Fuchs worked into 7" 911R configuration (widened 1" to the inside) it looks like the wheels with 205's (on the type 1 drums) clear the inner stuff by about 1/8" or so (the top snubber stop thingy still has to be trimmed a little more as well) and even clears the fender (on the right side- I haven't assembled the left yet- this week). I'd probably see about using a 1/8" spacer on each drum (for a little more spring plate clearance) if this was my end goal, but since I plan on running type 3 rear brakes (which will add 5/8" track to each side) the trailing arms will need to be narrowed a little anyway, so I can build in the spacing then.

 The trailing arms haven't been done yet, but I have been modifying the type 3 backing plates a little and drilled a few holes

lightened type 3 rear backing plate

(about 360) in each backing plate. And yes, it took one heck of a long time (I was at it off and on for 4 months). The backing plates originally weighed 1284 and 1285 grams and when I first started I was hoping to remove 100 grams on each. I thought I was doing really well when I had them down to 1070 g. and felt like I was pretty much finished (you have no idea how many hours are into these things!) when after showing the latest result of my work to Bruce one evening and he casually said (while we were partaking of a beverage in his garage), "I wonder what a type 1 backing plate weighs?". Oh boy... Well, we dug 1 up, stripped it, cleaned it a up (a little), put it on the scale and it weighed in at 1020 g. Bruce looks at me and says "yours isn't even as light as the type 1- there's lots of weight you can still take off! Are you really going to put it on the car like that?". And back to the drill press I went (this was all done at home on a small bench sized drill press or in a bench vice, btw). Each of the backing plates now weighs 852 grams- that's over 430 grams (15oz) lighter for each backing plate! This is the set up for drilling the holes on the outside edge- 

drilling holes in the edge

 

I know, a little crude, but it actually worked quite well! You just couldn't push on the plywood very hard. I really would love to own a rotary table. And the sad part is- every time I look at these things I see more places to remove weight...

One last pic- the flywheel started out lightened from GBE at 5241 grams (11 1/2 lbs), and after 6 or 7 hours at a friend's shop (this couldn't have been done without the accuracy of the milling and rotary tables), it

Al's lightened flywheel 

weighed in afterward at 4370 g. I removed 870 grams (1lb, 14.6 oz) so the flywheel now weighs just over 9 1/2 lbs. As a machinist I'm not very fast, but I did it all myself... Al

Al, would you not be concerned about the amount of debris ( road grime, water etc. ) that would enter the brake system through all the holes in the backing plate ? 

I have thought about that, David, but as this is (at this time) meant to be strictly a fair-weather car and I'm thinking about a screened scoop into the front half of the backing plate for ventilation/cooling (a la some 356's and 550's), we'll see how it goes. Have I gone too far? It's possible. I've even seen pics of 356 drums drilled in the contact face (3 rows of very small holes, I'm guessing for cooling). I got the type 3 rear drum assemblies pretty cheap (iIrc $160?) and I've used them with success on both a Cal Look and a baja bug, so I want to see how far I can take it. If it doesn't work as well as I hope I can always go to rear discs...

356B drum rear- drilled356B drum rear drilled 2  

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 356B drum rear drilled 2
Sacto Mitch posted:

@Jim Gilbert - Madison, Mississippi

You could get lucky, Jim.

Only about half the things on Gordon’s list needed fixing on my VS.

 

I've done much of what Gordon indicated. I've found wires not anchored, a few leaks, missing dash light bulbs; things like that. What I was complaining about was all related to the poor handling, which, with the help of the folks on this list is near corrected. I've spent $200 on parts to remedy that problem. Looks like JPS would have included that in their build. If all manufacturers omit caster shims, camber compensators and a proper alignment they should be open to suite. Maybe you have to sign a disclaimer, you know, like at the doctor. If they kill you it's your fault.

Gotta get that 40lbs.

Winter is short in Mississippi but there is some. It's 33 here this morning and promises to be 29 tonight. We used to get some 0 temps and I've seen 6" of snow. That hasn't happened since I was a kid. All because of Al Gore. I'm wiring the car for my electric motorcycle jackets and seats. We'll be warm and drive when it's not raining down here in the good ole South.

Ya'll come see us.

Yeah, the builder could certainly have included all that stuff and made it right when it shipped, but that would have been highly out of character for him.

As for ALB "Yoda" and his penchant for hole drilling.........

The Force/Madness is strong in this one....

Darth Tater

So sayeth "Darth Tater"

Kinda reminds me of my Sugino Bicycle crankset - just enough metal to give it torsional strength:

Crankset

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Darth Tater
  • Crankset
Gordon Nichols posted:

"The quote about adding 40lbs to the front was incorrectly attributed to Stan, It was from ALB and sounds reasonable since I have no spare, jack and tools."

That, in itself, is remarkable since Al seems to want to drill holes in just about everything to reduce weight in the car.  

I had to delete the spare in my CMC when I added the gas heater in the nose of the car.  In doing so I feel that I've lost about 15 pounds out there but haven't noticed any difference in handling on the road.  I haven't been on the track since the heater install so no data points there (yet!)

A seasoned driver might feel it on the track, but I don't think you're going to feel a 15 lb difference in the front end on the street unless you're pushing the car to it's limits all the time, every time you take it out of the garage. It would be interesting though (when spring comes), to throw 20 or 30 lbs in the front, drive it for a while and see what you think. I know you're running a lot of caster- is the camber on the front negative or positive? Do you remember how much toe-in there is? And iIrc the car has 205's (50's? 55's? 60's?) on 7" rims all around?

I know 40 lbs doesn't sound like much, but it changes the front weight bias by 2% on a 2,000 lb car (and more of course on a lighter car). You may need to adjust for it. If one is looking for his car to handle optimally, I think that's (a little bit of) a big deal.

Sacto Mitch posted:

 

ALB posted:
 

...It also gave me a good laugh right before bed!...

 

Hope you're not trying to save weight there, too, Al:

WeightSaver01

 

You funny man, Mitch!

@Jim Gilbert - Madison, Mississippi- Glad you're getting it sorted out. I would love to see your car (and of course meet you) in the near future. Are you planning a trip to Carlisle this coming spring?

PS- Does anybody have a 5 1/2 or 6" steel rim they can weigh? Knowing both 4x130 and 5x205 weights would be nice.

Yoda out (for now, but back you know I will be!)

 Another PS- And yeah, @Stan Galat, if I ever get the opportunity to use Barry's milling table again the flywheel will lose another pound. I already have plans...(insert big, evil laugh here!)

@Gordon Nichols- That bell crank's a perfect example- why carry it around if it's not needed?

Another PS- And yeah, @Stan Galat, if I ever get the opportunity to use Barry's milling table again the flywheel will lose another pound. I already have plans...(insert big, evil laugh here!)

@Gordon Nichols- That bell crank's a perfect example- why carry it around if it's not needed? You of all people should understand...

Now back to our regularly scheduled programming...

Last edited by ALB
Post Content
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×