Skip to main content

I thought the "Freeway Flyer" 3.88 ring & pinion vs the standard 4.125 ratio would give an extra 10 mph at 3000 RPMs which is probably worth the $1k cost (along with stronger side plates and welded gears). A side by side chart (see below) was posted on SAMBA that indicates more like a measily <1 MPH gain at 3k RPM and about 2 MPH at 5500 RPMs. Seems I have a "Free" way flyer in the '74 trans I recently got. Is it worth effort to have stronger side plate added and the 3 & 4th gears welded (for use with a 1641 cc engine)?

1957 CMC Classic Speedster

    in Ft Walton Beach, FL

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I thought the "Freeway Flyer" 3.88 ring & pinion vs the standard 4.125 ratio would give an extra 10 mph at 3000 RPMs which is probably worth the $1k cost (along with stronger side plates and welded gears). A side by side chart (see below) was posted on SAMBA that indicates more like a measily <1 MPH gain at 3k RPM and about 2 MPH at 5500 RPMs. Seems I have a "Free" way flyer in the '74 trans I recently got. Is it worth effort to have stronger side plate added and the 3 & 4th gears welded (for use with a 1641 cc engine)?

Attachments

Images (1)
  • VW T1 Transmission Info
Notice that 1st, 2nd and 3rd gear ratios are the same in both cases. With a smaller engine displacement - less torque - the use of a 4.12 R&P would give slightly better performance in lower gears, possibly allowing you to better keep up with traffic (damn those new Kias are quick!).

My "freeway flyer tranny" has a 3.88 R&P combined with a .89 4th gear, but I have a larger displacement engine and corresponding more torque.
David, I have the same fourth and a similarly large engine. I love the combination.
Wolfgang, that'd be about (pretty much exactly) 60 mph.
Alan Merklin drove the crap out of the Hoopty on the highway at Carlisle this year. He didn't ask about the gearing, but it's probably because he couldn't articulate anything with that big SEG on his face. He looked like a South Park Canadian; I thought the top of his head was going to fall off backward.
Larry (or someone similarly versed) can probably put the right years on the gears, but first came from a Bug, second from a 912, third from an early 911 and fourth came from a Bus.
They're all pretty well synchronized, but you have to go back down through second to get into first when decelerating -- or in order to take off from a stop from neutral.
First's kind of finickey about that. Same with reverse.
I don't quite know why -- but if you're taking off, it's bang, bang, bang ... wait a bit while third winds out, and then Bang. Smooth as silk. She LOVES third.
That really tall Bus fourth gear is good for a few extra miles an hour over what she used to do with a standard Bug gearbox.
I have a specific-year ('63?) Beetle transaxle case, in order to put the Bus clutch, short axles and the super-diff in there. We looked around for quite a while to find a donor.
What a difference.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 102706 tranny done
Post Content
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×