Skip to main content

I have copied info gathered by Cory Drake, Hooptypilot, from his posting on the FB version of the SOC.  It does go on for a bit ...

An interesting back-and-forth with Seth Gortenburg about the Starke Speedster’s return to the marketplace. I asked a few questions about how the company has changed in the years since its 2017 debut, and asked if he'd mind if I shared his answers. He was happy to have that opportunity..

The prior owners of the brand were not able to satisfy their promised demand, and Mr. Gortenburg has hopes that doing the hard work of careful engineering and a sustainable business model are about to pay off.
Although there is not yet a production car to show for the all-new Kansas City, Missouri-based company’s efforts, it looks like the process of producing cars on the 2017-current Porsche Boxster platform is off to a promising restart.

Comments are welcome! -- Cory
# # #

Starke Speedsters is under new ownership, promising an exciting Gen 2 car
Q&A with Seth Gortenburg, Starke Speedsters (Oct. 10, 2023)

Q: I understand your firm recently changed ownership. Can you give me a little history on the company?
A: Starke is the brainchild of Wade Morrison and his son who are huge fans of the 356 but wanted the drivability, performance and conveniences of a late model car. They spent several years planning production of the car and began building in 2017. The original Starke Speedster was based on a 2012 and below Boxster. The body was produced by cutting up a replica (I don’t know which one), making it fit the Boxster, and building molds (from) that.
The owners became frustrated since they had many orders -- but because they subcontracted all the work, could not produce the cars fast enough.
We purchased the company last year because we loved the concept -- and being car builders, were confident we could produce a top-notch car. Our first task was to retool to use a later model Boxster; 2017 and up. We purchased a car, disassembled it, 3D scanned the entire car and contracted an engineer with vintage Porsche design background to CAD design the car. We are now in the process of using a 5-axis machine (a multi-axis, subtractive manufacturing process in which the machine shapes the workpiece material and moves in 5 directions or vertically) to build molds and will begin producing panels soon.
Q: It sounds like Starke is now a subsidiary of an established, reputable company. What company is that?
A. Starke is its own company but part of the custom car family we have built. Bratt Brothers builds and upgrades resto-mods, muscle cars, hot rods, street rods and classics. Defco Trucks converts new F250-F450 trucks as well as Ram 4500’s. We have our own panels for those vehicles that replace the front fenders, bed sides, hood and grill. This process is very similar to what we are doing at Starke.
Q: What has happened with regard to prior orders taken under past ownership?
A. My understanding is all deposits were returned for any unfulfilled orders.
Q: When the company changed hands, were there any incomplete or finished cars sold with it?
A: No, there were no finished or unfinished cars available when we purchased the company.
Q: Where is your facility?
A: We are located in Grandview, MO, a suburb of Kansas City.
Q: Is your process all going to be under one roof?
A: Disassembly, panel fitting, and final assembly will all be under one roof. Paint and body will go to one of our partners that we currently use for our Hot Rod side of our business.
Q: Have you ever been in the manufacturing business before now? If so, what did you make?
A: I have extensive experience in manufacturing from being a partner in a company that manufactures conversions for new Ford and Ram trucks. We use a similar process as the Speedster will use to manufacture new body panels. I started a chain of truck and off-road centers that I owned for 28 years before selling to 4WP in 2019. My truck experience gave me a network or people to lean on for troubleshooting, vendor referrals and parts sourcing. During my time in the truck and off-road business, we built custom cars at one of the shops. Our partners that we use for body and paint work have been building custom cars for over 30 years. These are not collision centers. Strictly custom work. Our investment partners are real estate people but huge car enthusiasts and are as excited about this car as we are.
Q: How many people do you employ? May I assume this is a small company looking to grow?
A: We are less than 10 but are not looking to mass produce this car. We want it to remain somewhat exclusive.
Q: Are you hiring, and who are you looking for?
A: We are always looking for skilled techs as well as partners that can assist us in getting our cars in front of potential buyers.
Q: What, if anything, will you be subcontracting to other companies?
A: Upholstery.
Q: Your images appear to use most of the donor car’s interior contours, if not materials. It comes across as elegant and refined. What will you be offering in terms of customization?
A. The new Boxster interior is really nice but as an option, we would bring some nostalgia into the car. German square weave carpet, seat inserts, matching door panels inserts, our own emblems and painted trim.
Q: It sounds like you’ll be able to use most of the existing Boxster’s wiring harness. How will you be tailoring that for elective options – maybe dead-ending circuits (tire-pressure management or fog lights, for example) not in use on the finished vehicle?
A. We have contracted an electrical engineer to design an interface for any aftermarket items that may cause a problem. For example, the Boxster OE headlights are unique but we will be using 7” round LED lights similar to the 356 headlights. If not addressed, this would send a code that would cause a light on the dash.
Q: Whose VIN will Starke cars carry?
A: Our cars carry the original Boxster VIN.
Q: In the replica business, there are legal hurdles to overcome. Have you talked to Stuttgart?
A: We do have a legal agreement with Porsche that we take very seriously.
Q: Is the USDoT aware of your brand? Have you been asked to submit crash data?
A: No, they have not. We are not structurally changing the car.
Q: Understanding past production cars are not your responsibility — have any Starke cars been wrecked? If so, how did they fare?
A: I’m not aware of any crashes. We do not alter the OE safety in any way. All the original structural-safety pieces remain intact.
Q: How will the cars be marketed -- as an alternative to the traditional 356 replica, or as a Boxster alternative?
A: Both, I would say. It’s a car for the person that loves the iconic looks of the 356 but wants the drivability of a late model car.
Q: There are a few companies actively trying to improve the replica car experience. What’s special about the Starke Speedster?
A: I’m not sure our car falls into the replica category. There are a handful of cars out there labeled as “rebodied”. They went through the same process of using a late model car and building their own body panels.
Q: What is an example of a similarly rebodied car you would point at on the street?
A: Trans Am Worldwide is a great example. They use 6th-generation Camaro’s to build their Trans Ams and Chevelles.
Q: Where do you see yourself in the marketplace? Meaning, if I was looking to buy your car, who am I likely to be?
A: You love the looks of the car and the fact that you can drive it anywhere in comfort. You want something unique (that) you can take for a Sunday drive or use it as your everyday car. Wherever you live, it’s unlikely you will see another one like yours.
Q: Do you have a traditional buck you’re laying composites over? May we see how you’re doing that?
A: No bucks. Our car is built leveraging technology. By 3D scanning, we essentially created the car on a computer.
Q: The Boxster is a unibody; essentially a mid-engined tub. How are you re-bodying that?
A: Each body panel is removed and replaced with our panels using factory mounting points and hardware. All original hinges, weatherstrips, seals, etc. remain intact.
Q: How did you integrate existing safety systems?
A: The OE Boxster panels are a combination of aluminum and composite. The safety is underneath. Our panels retain all the safety. Our body, in essence, attaches just like the original panels. Bolts attach the front end, door skins are bonded, as are quarters. This is the same as the OE panels. We will not be modifying the chassis. We have engineered our body to fit, just as it was attached when it was new.
Q: Could you describe the bonding process within the context of panel subassemblies? Are you talking about fiberglass, carbon fiber, aircraft composites, or something new? Many of the replica owners reading this are familiar with fiberglass, but have probably not put bodies together.
A. We use foam insulation to fill gaps and then 3M body panel adhesive to bond the new panel to the sub structure. We offer fiberglass or optional carbon fiber. Fiberglass today is much different than polyester resin fiberglass of the past. We will be using the latest fiberglass technology, epoxy infused. It doesn’t bleed or move as polyester did.
Q: Could you describe your facility’s capacity — or what your facility will be capable of?
A: There are hundreds of hours that go into each car. They will be low production. We anticipate building six to 10 cars per year.
Q: How does the new consolidated weight affect ABS, power-assisted steering, crash sensors, braking algorithms, and so on?
A: Although the final weight likely will not be exactly the same, it will be very, very close. Currently, the design is going through simulated air-flow testing to be sure we are getting adequate air flow for cooling.
Q: Where do you plan to put the radiator(s)?
A. The radiators remain in their stock location at the front of the car. We are going through simulated wind tunnel testing to verify we have enough air flow.
Q: In a Boxster, in-car engine access is somewhat tricky and pretty limited. Will you be enabling greater access through your Speedster’s passenger compartment?
A. They are a little cumbersome to access and we will not be making it any easier. That said, it won’t be any harder. Our deck lid uses the same hinge points as the original so access is the same.
Q: Any plans to take a completed car to SEMA, where it can be peer-reviewed?
A: We have tentative shows on our schedule next year to display the cars. Although we attend SEMA every year, we are undecided about showing there.
Q: Would you mind sharing where you plan to have exhibits, assuming your schedule goes as planned?
A. Nothing is finalized yet, but we would like to work the Detroit and LA Auto Shows, Monterey and something on the east coast. We are certainly open to suggestion.
Q: I’m curious whether you have investors, and how are you raising capital. What does a buyer need to know?
A: We do have investors and are well funded. This is an expensive and time-consuming process. We have had an overwhelming response to the car and are excited to launch the first Starke Gen 2.
Q: When do you expect to have rolling demonstrator?
A. We are in the mold creation stage which should last 60-90 days. If all goes as planned, we should be assembling first of 2024 and have cars ready to go by March.
Q: What does a customer need to expect in terms of time, experimental technology, and patience? How long before I can have my car?
A: The cars should take approximately 90 days to build, start to finish, depending on options chosen. Actual time frame will depend on how many cars are in front of you. There is no experimental technology. Everything we are doing has been done before with different cars.
Q: What quality-assurance affirmations can you offer customers?
A: We are custom car builders and have built several “magazine” cars. Quality is our top priority and the reason we have invested in this process. Building them the way we are, the process is repeatable.
Q: Would you mind pointing us toward those published cars? In the absence of a Starke Speedster to look at, finished work is a great indicator of where you’re likely to take them in terms of quality.
A. Those cars were photographed for a magazine called Super Rod which no longer exists. Below is one of them.
A silver convertible car parked on a road

Description automatically generated
Q: How many of your cars would you think will be prototypes?
A. Our plan is to build two cars at once on the first go around. We’ll perfect a process on one, then move to the other.
Q: It will probably take several prototypes to work out inconsistencies -- which I think this hobby has come to expect -- and there will doubtless be a line of people looking to accept those risks in order to be first, or wanting to catch a break on cost in exchange for being guinea pigs. Any thoughts on those possibilities?
A. All custom cars have things you have to work through no matter how well you planned. We’ll be putting a lot of miles on our first cars before they go anywhere. We won’t ship any cars until we’re confident we’ve worked out the bugs. The great thing about this is we aren’t starting from scratch. We’re starting with a fully functioning Boxster.
Q: An aesthetic question: Who makes your wheels? They look like Coddingtons.
A: The original owner used several vendors for wheels. Coddington may have been one of them.
Q: Have you changed the windshield angle? Why or why not?
A: No, windshield remains intact. If we change it, the car no longer seals up as well and causes issues with the power top.
Q. Your website has images with both a chrome-edged windscreen and a painted one. Both look good on your car. Will that be an optional feature, or will that depend on what the donor car came with?
A. The Boxster has body a body color windshield frame. Some of the original Starke cars had the frames “wrapped” in chrome vinyl which is an option. We could also try spray chrome which has gotten much better in recent years. We’re going to wait until we have a close to finished car to decide if body color or chrome is better.
Q: What would a soft top look like? Can you offer me some details?
A: The soft top is the original Boxster top. Still functions just as it did.
Q: Will there be a hard-top in the works?
A. I think if the demand is there, we would probably just build a coupe based on a Cayman.
Q: Are salvage-titled cars candidates? How would it be insured or registered?
A: Salvage cars would work -- as long as the damage is limited to cosmetic. Since our panels use factory mounting points, we need the base structure of the car to be solid.
Q: Do you think you’ll be doing any engine modifications?
A: We offer exhaust and tuner upgrades. No internal mods.
Q: If I was to spend $250K on a rebody of a Boxster, I would expect supercar treatment on the details. Would you do a valuation letter to go with the car?
A: We are all about the details. Besides the body panels, there are many things to be addressed. Lighting, badges, trim, air flow, inner fenders, etc. We are even going to make the rear wing functional. We are happy to provide a valuation letter. Many times, carriers use the invoice for valuation. Our cars start at 135k plus the car.
Q: What is the payment structure like? How does someone go about actually spreading structured payments out?
A: We are taking slot deposits which guarantees your place in line. Once work starts on your car, we require ⅓ down. When paint/body is complete, we require ⅓. Last installment is when car is complete.
Q: Do you have any unaltered images of a car in progress, and how will the finished cars stack up to those images? In the past, everything has been Photo Shopped and glossy.
A: Since we are waiting on our first set of redesigned panels, the only images we have are of a naked Boxster. (Finished cars will be) similar, but not exact. Those are actual cars by the way. They did Photoshop to change the colors. We have made subtle changes to better mirror the 356. Our hood will be a little taller, side vents gone, a little rounder in the front. Additionally, we will be using more authentic mirrors and door handles.
We post daily on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube shorts, and Tik Tok. Our content is a mix of vintage 356 and Starke material. As we begin to build cars, it will move mostly to Starke content.
We have been on this project right at a year. It took months of research to find the best possible process, the best designer, the best engineer and the best manufacturer. We’re incredibly excited to actually start assembling cars. For the guys here in the building, the idea of driving what appears to be the iconic 356, the cars from movies like ‘Top Gun’ and ‘48 Hours,’ but a car that handles like a go kart, has a/c, power top, navigation, paddle shifters, leather interior (and more) is what drives us. It will be one of a kind, unique and beautiful -- and it’s almost ready.
sales@starkespeedster.com
480-999-3225

2007 JPS MotorSports Speedster

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I wondered what was going on with Starke. They've been all over Facebook, TikTok, and other social media showing a lot of real 356 Speedsters and Coupes and no Starke cars. This explains it. I'm pretty sure they're just building interest in the brand and getting people to comment on the videos etc. to see what the direction should be. I still like the idea, there's nothing wrong with more interesting cars.

130K plus the Boxter donor

"Concourse level" starts at $250K!

I want this to work, I really do; the more options the better. But I can see these buyers really being the type to fit in with this site, jmo.

And with all due respect to the new owners, I call bullchit on this statement:

"The owners became frustrated since they had many orders -- but because they subcontracted all the work, could not produce the cars fast enough."

They may have sold the new owners this line but since there's zero evidence they even produced a single car for a paying customer (regardless of all the bravado from the previus Starke owner on this site). "Couldn't produce fast enough"? How about "couldn't produce, period"?

Attachments

Images (1)
  • blobid0

.

It seems like all those cars they couldn't build fast enough, to a one, went to extremely private and publicity-shy owners.

Which is understandable for anyone who might be interested in such a car.

Whenever I'm out driving the Speedie, on the rare occasion that someone approaches me, curious about the car, I always drive off and make sure no photos are ever taken.

"It's just an old Karmann Ghia. Now, go away and leave me alone."

.

** Once again, Ed has typed faster than I can read:



The size difference between a 356 and a Boxster is enough to cause serious challenges 'stretching' the older car's envelope to 'fit' on the newer one. But with the Spyder, I'd think any attempts would be comical or grotesque.

As it is, on their first car Starke used some trim pieces that were already available for the replica 356 market, like horn grilles and tail lights, and, to me at least, those bits have always looked just plain too small on the larger car.

I think you can get away with lapses like that on a $30K kit car, but not on one nearing ten times as much.

And, if the new effort is being reworked for a later model Boxster chassis, I'd think the engineering differences would mean almost starting the whole project from scratch. How they're going to be delivering finished, tested customer cars by the spring is beyond me. Just keeping the computer from throwing codes has got to be nightmare enough.

And speaking of which, what is your friendly, local P-car dealer going to say when you roll up for service in this 'Boxster'?

Last edited by Sacto Mitch

I’ve been lost regarding the target audience for any of these since Starke first burst onto the scene.

Is it Porsche guys? I would imagine they’d sniff and tutt and cluck regarding it’s out-of-scale proportions, plebeian-model base car, and “look’t me! I’m a rich guy!” target audience.

Drivers? There’s nothing these things can do that their donors can’t do better.

Whoever it is, it won’t be me. If I had the coin to throw away on a Starke, I’d  buy a Boxster Spyder or more likely an LT1 Camaro SS with a Whipple supercharger and put the rest in an index fund.

I’ve got exactly what I want.

Last edited by Stan Galat

I can't speak to Stärke's target audience, but they (Stärke and Co.) have a lot of previous experience from one of their answers:

"Starke is its own company but part of the custom car family we have built. Bratt Brothers builds and upgrades resto-mods, muscle cars, hot rods, street rods and classics. Defco Trucks converts new F250-F450 trucks as well as Ram 4500’s. We have our own panels for those vehicles that replace the front fenders, bed sides, hood and grill. This process is very similar to what we are doing at Starke."

Reading through that long post, you find that Defco trucks take either a recent customer's truck or a brand new one from a dealer and very highly modify it to a bespoke version per the customer's wish list.  That includes replacing body panels (to the original attach points), interiors (ditto) and engine/drivetrain mods up to complete engine/drivetrain replacements (which sounds a lot like a "Glider" tractor-trailer tractor that gets delivered to "finish" shops, brand-new, without an engine installed - The shop installs a completely rebuilt older engine to bypass the smog rules which are all tailored to the year the engine was originally built.  There is a huge lobbying effort in Congress (whenever they actually DO anything) to insure that smog rules follow the engine's original manufactured date.  Same thing in Massachusetts and just about every other state.

Here is the Defco site - Take a look:

https://www.defcotrucks.com/

And here is the site for the owners of the group, the Bratt Brothers:

https://brattbrothers.com/

And here's a site on Glider exemptions because I mentioned it:

https://www.npr.org/sections/t...from-emissions-rules

Now, I'm familiar with the wicked-expensive Porsche crowd who buy custom GT3/GT4 cars more or less as a short term investment.  For them, dropping $250K on a custom car they'll  seldom drive and only keep long enough to see it appreciate 25+% and flip (which might only take a few months) is all they're looking for, other than to be "seen" at local C&Cs and events.  Most likely, they're buying the car with "Funny Money"; i.e. stock bonuses or a windfall from selling their start-up business.  Trust me, there are a LOT of those people around, especially on each coast and down in central Texas and Florida and we've seen some of them at car events.

So that gets us to Defco/Stärke - What's the difference between what Defco is doing and what Stärke is doing?  The design and development process is identical, but the difference is that the target audience is different with some overlap - One side wants a modern, bespoke sports car built to very high quality standards (Defco's words) that looks mostly like a classic, the other side wants a modern, bespoke pickup truck built to very high quality standards and customized to the customer's tastes (We used to call those "Bubba Trucks" when we lived down South and they were everywhere).  Some of those customers will surely overlap - Hauling their custom, Stärke Roadster in a custom, Aerovault trailer behind a custom Defco truck to make a showy entrance at a C&C - Happens all the time.  

Now THAT says "Look at me.....  I am a success.  And you....  You don't even know what a "plethora" is!"  (Three Amigos humor, there)

So you could spend your $250K windfall money on a Singer 911, or an Emory Outlaw, a custom Glider tractor Trailer or a Defco pickup.  

They're all the same.  They're trophy vehicles.

So you could find a Pre-A Porsche 356 Speedster or Gmund coupe and throw $250K at a restoration (that might be a low number) and end up with a car worth well over $400-500K and be afraid to drive it, or you could throw $250K at a Stärke roadster and drive the wheels off it.  Hmmmmmm.........    Decisions.

Last edited by Gordon Nichols

I was pretty sure this would raise some eyebrows and opinions.  There very well might be a market that makes this group some profit.  Sounds like they have a sense of fit and finish and appear to know how to do a proper re-body.  As they say, and as you can infer, this will be a Boxster, not a Speedster.  And I guess it will never look "right" to our jaded eyes, because we are so enamored of the original.  The slopey (?) windshield, the obvious inflated overall volume, and other such things will make it be not-a-Speedster.  And I think this is properly acknowledged. On balance, I wish Starke 2.0 luck and I think they know what they are doing, whereas Starke 1.0 did not. .  We will see.

@edsnova posted:

I thought they had built one car. I wonder where it went.

One went through the IAAI insurance salvage auction.  the standard 5-6 auction photos showed the true proportions that you don't see in tall the photoshopped and staged/angled photos.  It was a monstrosity.

I wish the Starke guys all the best and hope this works.  Personally I think retooling for the 718 is probably a mistake.  I just don't see taking a (in my opinion) beautiful 718 and turning it into a somewhat 356, especially for $200-350k "all-in".  BUT, that's why they make chocolate and vanilla.

I've always had my thoughts on Starke and I think that they should just stick to their price target market and also just call the car something else, (they're not going to get much love in here or from the Porsche community). A French company PGO (I think) did something similar a few years back and it actually looked somewhat interesting. I think that the under-pinnings were Peugeot.

Fahren Wie James Dean: PGO Speedster II Im Test, 41% OFF

Pgo Speedster 2 : essais, fiabilité, avis, photos, prix

@flatfourfan posted:

I've always had my thoughts on Starke and I think that they should just stick to their price target market and also just call the car something else, (they're not going to get much love in here or from the Porsche community). A French company PGO (I think) did something similar a few years back and it actually looked somewhat interesting. I think that the under-pinnings were Peugeot.

Fahren Wie James Dean: PGO Speedster II Im Test, 41% OFF

Pgo Speedster 2 : essais, fiabilité, avis, photos, prix

Those were a much more interesting "modern" take than anything Boxster based.

@Sacto Mitch posted:

.

It seems like all those cars they couldn't build fast enough, to a one, went to extremely private and publicity-shy owners.

Which is understandable for anyone who might be interested in such a car.

Whenever I'm out driving the Speedie, on the rare occasion that someone approaches me, curious about the car, I always drive off and make sure no photos are ever taken.

"It's just an old Karmann Ghia. Now, go away and leave me alone."

Agree; the "celebrity factor" can be a challenge for low key people like us; and more especially in the times we are living in now. The other day I had a little spooky experience: driving into the garage where I store my car I spotted a guy walking in towards me in the dark alleyway. As he got nearer the garage out of nowhere he seemed to try to vaguely approach me and say something in the darkness. I rolled down and slammed the garage door right in his face. That's also another reason for packing heat.

@flatfourfan posted:

I've always had my thoughts on Starke and I think that they should just stick to their price target market and also just call the car something else, (they're not going to get much love in here or from the Porsche community). A French company PGO (I think) did something similar a few years back and it actually looked somewhat interesting. I think that the under-pinnings were Peugeot.

Fahren Wie James Dean: PGO Speedster II Im Test, 41% OFF

Pgo Speedster 2 : essais, fiabilité, avis, photos, prix

Those look so similar to the SAS cars.

Post Content
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×